From Search to Synthesis
Systematic reviews remain the gold standard of evidence synthesis, yet a single interdisciplinary search returns tens of thousands of records — and by the time the review publishes a year later, its search is already stale. AI tools address pieces of the problem (screening here, extraction there) but run as disconnected components without a shared audit trail. LivingMeta integrates those pieces into one platform: continuous screening, multi-perspective AI extraction, automated gap analysis, and research threads where a human researcher and an AI agent build on each other's work within a reproducible workflow.
Findings cite by paper identifier, not by invented authors. Every extraction carries the perspectives that produced it — where they agreed, where they disagreed — visible to anyone reading the synthesis. The underlying data is open, every pipeline step is versioned and logged, and the final word on a disputed extraction is a human reviewer, not a model.
650K+
papers
6
featured fields
continuous
updates
What You'll Find Inside
Every instance gives researchers four linked surfaces — each one populated by the same continuous pipeline.
Browse the Literature
Every paper in the field, classified by relevance and cross-validated by multiple AI perspectives. Filter by methodology or evidence model; agreement scores flag where the AI is confident, and disagreement shows where human judgment belongs.
Curated Datasets & Tools
Datasets, questionnaires, measurement instruments, and research tools surfaced across the corpus, each linked back to the papers that use them. Reusable building blocks for the next study — not locked inside per-paper notes.
Priority Research Agenda
A ranked list of high-impact evidence gaps, generated from the literature itself and scored for frequency, depth, and feasibility. Updates as the field evolves — a living research priorities document, not a frozen opinion piece.
Collaborative Research Threads
Researchers work alongside an AI agent — from exploring a question to designing a study to writing it up. Uploaded documents, cited papers, and findings stay with the thread. Role-adaptive coaching scales the scaffolding to the researcher's expertise.
Foundation Paper
From Search to Synthesis: A Living Research Platform for AI-Augmented Evidence Mapping
M.J.J. Wolters — VU University Amsterdam / Erasmus University Rotterdam
The full argument — methodology, validation, architecture decisions — lives in the paper. Reach out and we send it over.
Request PDF — info@livingmeta.aiFeatured Research Fields
Six fields with active instances. More are online; these are the ones we currently support for new users.
Sports Analytics
~120K papersRSM Erasmus University Rotterdam
Performance analysis, tactics, player evaluation, and betting markets — across every sport and methodology.
Innovation Management
~170K papersTU Delft — Technology, Policy and Management
Innovation, entrepreneurship, technology commercialization, and the diffusion of new high-tech products.
Management Consulting
~110K papersVU Amsterdam — M&O
Consulting engagements, professional service firms, and the evidence behind consulting interventions.
Public Governance
~70K papersVU Amsterdam — FSW
Governance, integrity, public values, and accountability in the public sector.
Emergent Organizational Change
~55K papersOpen University of the Netherlands
Sensemaking, power dynamics, and organizational development in complex public and professional organizations.
Menstrual Health at Work
~130K papersPeriod Media
The intersection of menstrual health, menstrual disorders, and menopause with the workplace — absenteeism, policy, disclosure, stigma, and the legislation shaping cycle-aware employers.
Your Own Instance?
A dedicated subdomain for your field. We build the corpus, run the pipeline, and hand you the keys. You keep ownership of the data and the direction.
Or email us directly at info@livingmeta.ai